LAND DEVELOPMENT CONTROL COMMITTEE

MINUTES OF MEETING HELD ON 11^th DECEMBER 2002

PLANNING APPLICATIONS

Please note that the following information clause is attached to the decision notice of all full building applications that are approved with or without conditions.

¨ NB This permission does not in any way constitute a waiver of the need to obtain building permission for this proposed development and any other necessary Government licensees and or permits that may be required. The applicant is responsible for obtaining all necessary licenses that may be required.

2002/0057 Advertisement, South Hill (28411B/4) Jill Walker

Approved subject to the following conditions:

1. The advertisement must always have the road name or area name displayed prominently.

2. Permission for this sign will continue for a period of up to 3 years. Further planning permission is required for the advertisement following the expiration of this period.

3. The applicant is responsible for the maintenance and condition of the advertisement and must keep it in a clean and undamaged condition.

2002/0110 Food Van, Water Swamp (48613B/60) Keith Brooks

Deferred for:

i. the provision of bathroom facilities; and

ii. the provision of proper parking facilities.

2002/0121 Subdivision, Seafeathers (99315B/89) James Ronald & Cleopatra Webster

Deferred for discussion with the agent regarding the proposal to show the amalgamation of Lot 2 with an adjacent parcel.

2002/0372 Extension to commercial building (Wholesale), North Valley (58715B/130) Lenora Connor

Refused for the following reason:

1. This proposal, for which construction has already commenced, provides inadequate off-street parking and servicing facilities and as such poses a traffic hazard to the area and is detrimental to the amenity of the area.

Information Note:

As the development has commenced without the benefit of planning permission or building permit approval, the applicant is advised that enforcement action will be recommended if no appeal is lodged against this refusal within the 30 day time period stated below.

2002/0398 Subdivision, South Hill (38612B/109) Othniel Richardson

Approved

2002/0402 Dwelling House, Sandy Hill (69215B/43) Isaac & Janis Boston

Deferred for a survey plan to be submitted.

2002/0427 Advertisement, George Hill (38713B/13) Straw Hat Restaurant

Approved subject to the following conditions:

1. Permission for this sign will continue for a period of up to 3 years or until:

a) an official (Government or statutory service provider) road name sign has been erected or;

b) road widening or other improvements to the road require it’s removal.

Further planning permission is required for the advertisement following the expiration of this period.

2. The applicant is responsible for the maintenance and condition of the advertisement and must keep it in a clean and undamaged condition.

2002/0441 Subdivision, Long Pond (79114B/2) Carlton and Shirley Kidd

Approved.

2002/0448 Dwelling House, Sandy Ground (08512B/157) Ian Carty

Deferred for:

a) the submission of a location plan;

b) the correct parcel number to be stated on the application forms;

c) the septic tank / sewage package treatment plant to be shown on the site plan;

d) the proposed living dining kitchen area to meet at least the minimum standards of the Anguilla Building Code (i.e. 180 sq.ft);and

e) the site plan to show the location of off-road parking (minimum of 1.5 spaces per residential unit).

2002/0449 Apartments, Rey Hill (78913B/232) Jacqueline Leonard

Approved subject to relocation of the parking area to the north of the site.

2002/0450 Dwelling House, Sachasses (48714B/559) Vernette Richardson

Approved.

2002/0451 Dwelling House, West End (17809B/402) Amy Richardson

Approved.

2002/0452 Extension to commercial building (Shop), South Hill (08412B/1) Sidney Hughes

Deferred for:

a) the submission of a location plan;

b) the septic tank / sewage package treatment plant to be shown on the site plan; and

c) the distance of the proposal from the side boundaries to be shown on the site plan.

2002/0453 Dwelling House, Sandy Hill (99315B/170) Ralf & Orietta Geha

Approved.

2002/0454 Commercial, The Valley (58814B/24) Leroy Gumbs

Approved with the standard outline condition.

2002/0455 Dwelling House, West End (17809B/46) Pam & Ralf Koppay Pinto

Deferred for provision of setbacks that are at least to the minimum standard i.e. 16 feet from front and rear boundary and 6 feet from side boundary.

2002/0456 Dwelling House, Blowing Point (28411B/85) Derrick Gumbs

Deferred for a registered access.

2002/0457 Subdivision, The Farrington (69014B/124) Emmanuel R Carty

Deferred for the provision of the right of way to be a minimum of 16 feet in width.

2002/0458 Dwelling House, Cauls Pond (69014B/174) Shirley Payne

Approved

2002/0459 Apartments, West End (28211B/1) William Gumbs

Deferred for provision of site access from the right of way to the west of the site rather than from the Rendezvous Road to the north.

2002/0460 Subdivision, Stoney Ground (58916B/232) Clifford Reid

Approved

2002/0461 Subdivision, Long Ground (58716B/7) John Gumbs

Approved subject to the right of way on the eastern boundary being a minimum of 25ft in width.

2002/0462 Subdivision, North Hill (49713B/192) Lena Gumbs

Approved

2002/0463 Extension to commercial building (Restaurant/Bar), The Valley (48814B/8) Anguilla Liquors & Tobacco Ltd

Deferred for the septic tank / sewage package treatment plant being shown on the site plan.

2002/0464 Crematorium, George Hill (38612B/18) Hugo Rey

Deferred for:

i. Radio announcement and public consultation;

ii. Consultation with a Government agency;

iii. The applicant to erect a public notice on site / appropriately located as to be visible from Edwin Wallace Rey Drive;

iv. The applicant to submit details of existing floor layout; and

v. Amendment of the proposed floor layout plan and elevations to show the crematorium stack (chimney).

2002/0465 Mechanic shop, Corito (38813B/55) Anguilla Electricity Company

Approved subject to the access to the development being taken from the existing Main Station access road.

2002/0466 Dwelling House, Lockrum (38611B/ ) Chris & Brenda Lawrence

Approved subject to relocation of the proposed access way to either the northern or southern site boundary to facilitate shared access from adjacent parcel onto the future EDF road.

2002/0467 Subdivision, South Hill (38512B/70) Basil Brooks

Approved subject to the three rights of way which are internal to the site running east to west being each a minimum of 25ft in width.

2002/0468 Dwelling House, South Hill (38512B/182) Maureen Woodley

Approved

2002/0469 Subdivision, Island Harbour (89218B/301) Alfred Webster

Approved

2002/0470 Extension to House, Cauls Bottom (69015B/40) Ivan Hawley Melsadis Webster

Approved

2002/0471 Clinic Extension, East End (79213B/185) Dr. Patrick Vanterpool

Approved subject to the standard outline condition.

2002/0472 Subdivision, Blowing Point (38410B/228) Mary Connor

Deferred for :

a) the subdivision plan to show the proposed ‘EDF’ road;

b) the right of way on the northern boundary of Lots 18 and 22 being increased in width to a minimum of 20 feet; and

c) the subdivision being amended to show all Lots gaining access from the right of way referred to in b) above rather than the EDF road.

2002/0473 Subdivision, Blowing Point (38410B/226) Mary Connor

Deferred for :

a) the subdivision plan to show the proposed ‘EDF’ road;

b) the right of way on the northern boundary of Lots 12, 13 and 14 being increased in width to a minimum of 20 feet and;

c) the subdivision being amended to show all Lots gaining access from the right of way referred to in b) above rather than the EDF road.

2002/0474 Dwelling House, Cedar Village (58716B/176) Leroy & Debbie Richardson

Approved

2002/0477 Subdivision, Rendezvous (28110B/5) Flag Luxury Resorts

Deferred for:

i. submission of an Environmental Impact Assessment for the golf course development.

ii. submission of a Final Master Plan for the development that shows clearly the linkages and relationship between this current proposal and other features and land uses. For example, the submitted subdivision proposal shows a road network, which differs, from the last ‘master plan’ that was submitted. The Master Plan should include all land in ownership of Flag Luxury Properties or for which they are seeking to develop. For example, the LDCC has been advised that land to the west Block 28009B/12 may be forming part of the overall development.

iii. submission of a project brief that clearly indicates (preferably in tabular format) the land use proposals including the acreage number of units etc for the project. For example, x acres of residential use providing Y dwellings.

In addition to the matters listed above the following details are also required for this proposed subdivision:

a) payment of an additional EC$30 for ‘Lot 21’ which will be the ‘remainder’ i.e. rest of golf course development site.

b) the application form and plan need amending accordingly to take account of a) above.

c) submission in triplicate of a location plan (as highlighted on the application form).

d) clear indication of extent of the following on an appropriate scaled plan of :

§ Rocky shoreline

§ Dune areas to the rear of the rocky shoreline

§ Coastal vegetation line.

§ Relationship of proposed lots and right of ways.

The LDCC note that there is a key opportunity as part of the overall golf course development to create a coastal path / walkway for public use along the southern site boundary. At the same time the established LDCC policy (which has been supported by Executive Council on appeals) is that all permanent built development (buildings, other structures, pools septic tanks etc) must be set back a minimum of 75 feet from the vegetation line on rocky shorelines. Therefore the allocation of land, possibly as a single lot, for the purpose of a coastal path is actively encouraged.

e) The application indicates 12 of the 20 proposed lots are larger than the ½ acre size that is permitted under the Alien Land Act. Written details of justification for this should be submitted as part of this application. Given the required setback stated in ‘d’ above the alterations may reduce the actual lot sizes for lots 13 to 20 inclusive.

f) The creation of triple and double frontage lots is not encouraged by the LDCC. The current application has Lot 8 being triple fronted and lot 7 is double fronted. It is difficult to assess whether further lots will be similarly affected, as the wider road network has not been shown.

g) The width of the proposed right of way and, how this relates to other roads in the development need to be clearly indicated on the application.